Regional Developments in the Battle for Syria

In an unfolding tragic tale of twists and turns, the Syrian conflict has transmuted from that of a solidarity show of support for the Arab Spring in 2011 to that of a continuous conflagrative self destruction perpetrated by a cesspool of several armed opposition factions majorly under the umbrella of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), several Jihadi groups notable among which are the Al Nusra Front and the Islamic State (IS); all of which though disunited on the battle front, are fighting a common cause of overthrowing the government of Bashar al-Assad.

Since 2011, when the conflict started, it was insinuated that the Syrian regime will fall, like that of Tunisia and Egypt within a couple of months. As protests against the government simmered, it was met with brute response from the security forces and that gave birth to the armed opposition mostly made up disaffected government soldiers under the umbrella of the Free Syrian Army (FSA). With a resolute government not ready to stand down, the scenario turned from that of protest scenes to a full scale conflict.

As world powers (US, UK, France, China and Russia) bickered on resolutions and counter resolutions to resolve the ensuing conflict, their actions and inactions buoyed by an unstable neighbouring Iraq facing a Jihadi insurgency turned the tide of the conflict to that of an unfolding grotesque. Jihadi fighters under the platform of the Islamic State or ISIS and the Al-Nusra front with a vision of creating an Islamic Caliphate in the entire Middle East launched cross border incursions into Syria. For the Jihadists they had two enemies; the Syrian government and the armed opposition forces. On the long run, the Islamic State (IS) gained much ground and declared a caliphate on conquered territories covering Iraq and Syria.

Haunted by the ripples of past military campaigns in the Middle East notably Iraq, the US and the Western powers though yearning for the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad dithered in active military support for the Syrian Opposition and with the Syrian regime finding active support from Russia, there was no blithe to the aggression of the opposition. As such, the Syrian conflict was left to run its brutal self destructive cause with the hope that the struggle would be resolved on the battle field.

The rise of the Islamic State kitted with sophisticated weaponry captured from the US kitted Iraqi army has changed the face of the conflict. With the capture of large swathes of territory across Iraq and Syria by this group, they seem poised to give a knockout blow to what is left of the regimes in Iraq and Syria and then expanding their conquest beyond. Faced with this threat and brutal executions of hostages by the Islamic state, the US together with a coalition of Western and Arab Countries have begun to take military action, launching airstrikes against IS targets. However, airstrikes alone will not wipe of the capabilities of the Islamic State and whilst the US do have a working relationship with the Iraqi government, the same cannot be said with the Syrian government.

Peace moves have seemed elusive and those arranged in Geneva (Geneva 1 and Geneva 2) between the Syrian opposition and the government ended inconclusively, voiding the wisdom of top diplomats in Koffi Annan and Lakhdar Brahimi.

Lessons learnt from the intrigues of the Arab Spring especially in Libya and the Iraqi story after the US invasion of 2003 have proved that overthrowing strong regimes to the mercies of an uncoordinated opposition don`t  favour the stability of the State either on the short or long run; therefore, it might be tragic to note that at this stage of the conflict, the US is still trying to identify ‘the moderate armed opposition’ to kit with arms in the fight against the Islamic State.

The Syrian conflict at this stage will be best resolved by the use of force against the Islamic State and other extremist groups and political negotiation between the opposition and government. Seeing that the Syrian Opposition does not have control over the activities of the armed opposition (Free Syrian army) and that the armed Opposition in itself do have a concrete command structure, the sustenance of the regime of Bashar al-Assad becomes expedient for the survival and continuity of the Syrian state.

The Syrian people have suffered untold causalties destruction of their homeland and this has had a spiral effect on neighbouring countries. As such, the conflict should be resolved by pragmatic means at this stage forgiving past misdeeds.


Proposed by

on 3 March 2015

4 persons shared their opinion! Join the discussion!

  • Patricia said on Reply

    Thank you for your article on Syria.

    I was wondering, what will happen after the conflict ends with all the refugees who have fled the country? Will they return in your opinion?

    How is the current war zone crisis affecting the economy now and what will be the impact on the long run?

    How do you see Syria now in the Middle East?

    Do you think that the collaboration between Syria and its neighbors will improve in the future, when the conflicts ends?

    • Samson Faboye said on Reply

      Right now, the only thing Syrians need is an end to the conflict. Its gotten too destructive not only for Syria but for her neighbours.
      Peace must be created by whatever means and the now fractious relationship between the Shias and Sunnis torturing the entire middle east must end

  • Nuzhat Aman said on Reply

    The Syrian crisis has effected the economy so badly. In the continued absence of a political solution to the crisis, economic activity under the on going war like situation in Syria has been suffered the chances of economic survival. The central government remains the only & important state-like actor paying salaries & pensions to an estimated 2million people. Exports have lost 80% of their value from2010 to 2015. Nonetheless oil out put has dropped significantly in recent years, because many oil fields are under control of isis or Daesh. Although Syria was not one of the biggest oil producer. The commodity accounted for about 30% of government revenue in 2010. Another long-run economic problem facing Syria is the demographic catastrophe cause by the crisis. Syria’s pre-war population was around 22million, but an estimated 4.8million refugees have left the country equal to about 22% of the initial population. Nevertheless to its really critical situation for the long-run is, an estimated 4million Syrian children are not currently in school.
    In the end it seems Syrian economy has been extremely damaged by the crisis & evident that the ongoing Syrian crisis will have social, economic, humanitarian, political & security for several years to come. However it is hard to understand & say the consequences this crisis has had & continue to have on the MENA region specifically & doesn’t seem that there will b a quick fix or solutions of the problems of Syrian refugees.

    • Samson Faboye said on Reply

      Thanks for your insightful updates about the Syrian Conflict Nuzhat. It is sad that the conflict is yet showing no signs of ending years after this article was written. We still continue to hope against hope that things improve. But sadly, the decisions about the Syrian conflict is now beyond Syrians and for international powers and actors to decide

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *